EN 10088-2 vs ASTM A240: can they be interchanged?
Both cover stainless plate and strip, but chemistry ranges, mechanical properties and inspection rules differ. Common grades correspond, yet interchangeability must not be assumed.
EN 10088-2 and ASTM A240 are the two standards most often encountered when buying stainless flat products. Whether they can be interchanged depends on the grade and application.
Similarities: both specify grades, chemical composition, mechanical properties and delivery condition. 1.4301 vs 304 and 1.4404 vs 316L are generally regarded as corresponding grades.
Differences:
• Chemistry ranges: upper/lower limits and permitted deviations for Cr, Ni and Mo are not identical.
• Mechanical properties: guaranteed yield, tensile and elongation values differ.
• Inspection and retest rules: sampling position, test methods and certificate content differ.
• Surface and dimensional standards: EN frequently references EN 10051 / EN 10131, ASTM references A480 and others.
Practical advice:
1) State the standard and grade on the design drawing (e.g. "304 per ASTM A240" or "1.4301 per EN 10088-2").
2) When dual certification is required, ask the supplier to list both standards' chemistry and properties on the mill certificate.
3) For pressure, low-temperature or safety-related parts, run project-specific supplementary tests rather than relying on a grade equivalence table.
In short: common grades correspond, but "corresponding" does not mean "unconditionally interchangeable".