Verified global steel networkEncrypted · node-isolated
Help center
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
Market IntelSourcingKnowledgeQ&ACommunity
The steel home
New Q&A today—Verified experts—Knowledge items—City gatherings—open
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
A verified collaboration network and digital living room for the global steel chain.
Steel is We.
Places
Intel
Matching
Knowledge
Hall of fame
Gatherings
Industry polls
Help & support
MTC verification
Standards
Company verification
On-chain evidence
AI assistant
Defects
Pricing
API 开放平台
About
About us
Guidelines
Privacy
Terms
Contact
RSS · 知识
Global steel intelligence
Weekly global steel market updates, CBAM compliance and process insights.
Weekly digest
© 2026 SteelWe Community.
Founded and operated by steel companies.
GB/T · ASTM · EN · JIS · ISO
[Regional nodes & data compliance] China data stays on the mainland node; the EU node follows GDPR and CBAM data requirements.
HomeForumQ&AKBMe
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Knowledge
  4. /
  5. Entry
ARTICLE
👁 1
⏱ ~1 min read
EN 10204 · 3.1 · 3.2 · 质保书 · 验收

EN 10204 3.1 vs 3.2 Certificates: The Difference Lies in Who Issues Them

A 3.1 certificate is issued by the manufacturer's quality department and declares conformity with the order requirements; a 3.2 certificate is issued and the tests witnessed by an independent inspection body or authorized representative outside the manufacturer and with no interest in the manufacturer.
EN 10204 specifies the types of inspection documents for metallic materials. 3.1: Issued by an inspection representative authorized by the manufacturer's quality department, declaring that the products conform to the order requirements, and accompanied by inspection results such as cast analysis and mechanical properties; the document is produced within the manufacturer's system. 3.2: Issued by an independent inspection body or authorized representative outside the manufacturer and with no interest in the manufacturer, typically requiring third-party witnessing of sampling and testing, with the document signed by the third party. Practical differences: 3.1 is low-cost and fast to deliver, suitable for general industrial use; 3.2 offers stronger credibility and traceability and is often used for pressure vessels, offshore engineering, nuclear power, and projects specified by the owner. When purchasing, the contract should clearly specify the required type, inspection items, witnessing method, and document language, to avoid acceptance problems after delivery due to a mismatch in document grade.
Compiled by SteelWe editors and industry experts. For industry exchange only; not trading or investment advice. Cite the source when quoting.
Related
Standards ⇄
Q&A ❓
Defect atlas ⚙
Industry glossary 📖
Need a case-specific assessment?
Ask with grade, medium, temperature and process — experts give reasoning.
Ask now →
Ask AI (cites this knowledge base only)
Answers cite knowledge-base entries; uncovered questions become topic gaps.
Key takeaways?When does it not apply?Procurement pitfalls?