Verified global steel networkEncrypted · node-isolated
Help center
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
Market IntelSourcingKnowledgeQ&ACommunity
The steel home
New Q&A today—Verified experts—Knowledge items—City gatherings—open
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
A verified collaboration network and digital living room for the global steel chain.
Steel is We.
Places
Intel
Matching
Knowledge
Hall of fame
Gatherings
Industry polls
Help & support
MTC verification
Standards
Company verification
On-chain evidence
AI assistant
Defects
Pricing
API 开放平台
About
About us
Guidelines
Privacy
Terms
Contact
RSS · 知识
Global steel intelligence
Weekly global steel market updates, CBAM compliance and process insights.
Weekly digest
© 2026 SteelWe Community.
Founded and operated by steel companies.
GB/T · ASTM · EN · JIS · ISO
[Regional nodes & data compliance] China data stays on the mainland node; the EU node follows GDPR and CBAM data requirements.
HomeForumQ&AKBMe
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Knowledge
  4. /
  5. Entry
ARTICLE
👁 1
⏱ ~1 min read
321 · 304H · 高温 · 选型

321 vs. 304H: Stabilized Choices for High-Temperature Service

321 is stabilized with titanium, while 304H has a higher carbon content; both are used in high-temperature applications. 321 offers more reliable intergranular corrosion resistance, while 304H provides higher high-temperature strength. Select based on temperature and medium.
In high-temperature environments (approximately 500–800°C), standard 304 readily precipitates chromium carbides, leading to intergranular corrosion and reduced strength. 321 adds Ti (≥5×C) to form stable titanium carbides, suppressing sensitization; it is suitable for high-temperature piping, heat exchangers, and components that cannot be solution-annealed after welding. 304H has a higher carbon content (0.04–0.10%) and controlled grain size, giving it better high-temperature creep strength than 304/321; it is suitable for boilers, superheaters, and other long-term high-temperature pressure-bearing components. Selection logic: choose 321 when intergranular corrosion resistance and post-weld service are the priority; choose 304H/347H when high-temperature strength and creep performance are the priority. Neither is suitable for environments with severe chloride-ion corrosion.
Compiled by SteelWe editors and industry experts. For industry exchange only; not trading or investment advice. Cite the source when quoting.
Related
Standards ⇄
Q&A ❓
Defect atlas ⚙
Industry glossary 📖
Need a case-specific assessment?
Ask with grade, medium, temperature and process — experts give reasoning.
Ask now →
Ask AI (cites this knowledge base only)
Answers cite knowledge-base entries; uncovered questions become topic gaps.
Key takeaways?When does it not apply?Procurement pitfalls?