Verified global steel networkEncrypted · node-isolated
Help center
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
Market IntelSourcingKnowledgeQ&ACommunity
The steel home
New Q&A today—Verified experts—Knowledge items—City gatherings—open
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
A verified collaboration network and digital living room for the global steel chain.
Steel is We.
Places
Intel
Matching
Knowledge
Hall of fame
Gatherings
Industry polls
Help & support
MTC verification
Standards
Company verification
On-chain evidence
AI assistant
Defects
Pricing
API 开放平台
About
About us
Guidelines
Privacy
Terms
Contact
RSS · 知识
Global steel intelligence
Weekly global steel market updates, CBAM compliance and process insights.
Weekly digest
© 2026 SteelWe Community.
Founded and operated by steel companies.
GB/T · ASTM · EN · JIS · ISO
[Regional nodes & data compliance] China data stays on the mainland node; the EU node follows GDPR and CBAM data requirements.
HomeForumQ&AKBMe
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Knowledge
  4. /
  5. Entry
ARTICLE
👁 1
⏱ ~1 min read
304 · 316L · 选型 · 耐蚀

304 vs 316L: Start with the Chloride Environment

304 is sufficient for normal atmospheric, fresh water, and indoor environments; 316L contains 2–3% molybdenum and offers markedly stronger resistance to chloride pitting, so it should be preferred for coastal, chemical, and high-salt food applications.
304 is an 18%Cr-8%Ni austenitic stainless steel with the best balance of workability, weldability, and cost, making it suitable for indoor decoration, kitchenware, general storage tanks, and normal atmospheric environments. 316L adds 2–3% molybdenum (Mo) to the 304 base, significantly improving resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion, and is especially suited to coastal high-salt-fog conditions, chloride-containing media, chemical piping, and food and pharmaceutical equipment; the L stands for low carbon (≤0.03%), which reduces the risk of weld sensitization. Selection sequence: first assess the chloride concentration in the environment and whether standing water can accumulate, then consider the medium temperature and welding requirements, and finally cost. In normal environments with no chloride exposure, 304 offers better value; where conditions are uncertain or involve long-term damp, salt-containing conditions, going directly to 316L is the safer choice.
Compiled by SteelWe editors and industry experts. For industry exchange only; not trading or investment advice. Cite the source when quoting.
Related
Standards ⇄
Q&A ❓
Defect atlas ⚙
Industry glossary 📖
Need a case-specific assessment?
Ask with grade, medium, temperature and process — experts give reasoning.
Ask now →
Ask AI (cites this knowledge base only)
Answers cite knowledge-base entries; uncovered questions become topic gaps.
Key takeaways?When does it not apply?Procurement pitfalls?