Verified global steel networkEncrypted · node-isolated
Help center
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
Market IntelSourcingKnowledgeQ&ACommunity
The steel home
New Q&A today—Verified experts—Knowledge items—City gatherings—open
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
A verified collaboration network and digital living room for the global steel chain.
Steel is We.
Places
Intel
Matching
Knowledge
Hall of fame
Gatherings
Industry polls
Help & support
MTC verification
Standards
Company verification
On-chain evidence
AI assistant
Defects
Pricing
API 开放平台
About
About us
Guidelines
Privacy
Terms
Contact
RSS · 知识
Global steel intelligence
Weekly global steel market updates, CBAM compliance and process insights.
Weekly digest
© 2026 SteelWe Community.
Founded and operated by steel companies.
GB/T · ASTM · EN · JIS · ISO
[Regional nodes & data compliance] China data stays on the mainland node; the EU node follows GDPR and CBAM data requirements.
HomeForumQ&AKBMe
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Knowledge
  4. /
  5. Entry
ARTICLE
👁 1
⏱ ~1 min read
表面缺陷 · 英文术语 · 外贸 · 验收 · 术语

表面缺陷英文对照:划伤、辊印、氧化皮、麻点、夹杂、起皮

外贸与质保书常用英文描述表面缺陷。记住 scratch/roll mark/scale/pit/inclusion/sliver 等词,验收沟通更准确。
不锈钢外贸、质保书与客户投诉中常用英文描述表面缺陷,常见对照:
| 中文 | 英文 | 说明 | |---|---|---| | 划伤 | scratch | 机械接触造成的线状损伤 | | 辊印 | roll mark / roll defect | 轧辊表面问题复刻到板面 | | 氧化皮 | scale / oxide scale | 热轧或退火后未除净 | | 麻点 | pit / pitting | 点状凹坑,可能是腐蚀或压入 | | 夹杂 | inclusion | 钢中非金属夹杂暴露 | | 起皮 | sliver / peeling | 表面薄层剥落 | | 色差 | color difference / staining | 钝化或清洗不均 | | 边裂 | edge crack | 边缘开裂 | | 波浪 | waviness | 板形问题 |
沟通建议:
1) 描述缺陷时给出"位置 + 尺寸 + 数量/密度 + 照片",比只用英文单词更有效; 2) 质保书/合同引用标准中的缺陷定义与允许限度; 3) 外贸索赔要附照片、测量记录与批次号,必要时第三方检验。
术语一致能减少误解,但证据(照片与数据)才是索赔关键。
Compiled by SteelWe editors and industry experts. For industry exchange only; not trading or investment advice. Cite the source when quoting.
Related
Standards ⇄
Q&A ❓
Defect atlas ⚙
Industry glossary 📖
Need a case-specific assessment?
Ask with grade, medium, temperature and process — experts give reasoning.
Ask now →
Ask AI (cites this knowledge base only)
Answers cite knowledge-base entries; uncovered questions become topic gaps.
Key takeaways?When does it not apply?Procurement pitfalls?