Verified global steel networkEncrypted · node-isolated
Help center
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
Market IntelSourcingKnowledgeQ&ACommunity
The steel home
New Q&A today—Verified experts—Knowledge items—City gatherings—open
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
A verified collaboration network and digital living room for the global steel chain.
Steel is We.
Places
Intel
Matching
Knowledge
Hall of fame
Gatherings
Industry polls
Help & support
MTC verification
Standards
Company verification
On-chain evidence
AI assistant
Defects
Pricing
API 开放平台
About
About us
Guidelines
Privacy
Terms
Contact
RSS · 知识
Global steel intelligence
Weekly global steel market updates, CBAM compliance and process insights.
Weekly digest
© 2026 SteelWe Community.
Founded and operated by steel companies.
GB/T · ASTM · EN · JIS · ISO
[Regional nodes & data compliance] China data stays on the mainland node; the EU node follows GDPR and CBAM data requirements.
HomeForumQ&AKBMe
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Knowledge
  4. /
  5. Entry
ARTICLE
👁 1
⏱ ~1 min read
法兰 · GB/T 9119 · ASME B16.5 · EN 1092-1 · 标准对照

不锈钢法兰标准对照:GB/T 9119、ASME B16.5 与 EN 1092-1

国标、美标、欧标法兰在压力等级、密封面与尺寸上有差异。对照时要同时看压力等级、密封面型式与螺栓孔距。
不锈钢法兰采购常遇到 GB/T 9119(国标)、ASME B16.5(美标)与 EN 1092-1(欧标),对照要点:
| 项目 | GB/T 9119 | ASME B16.5 | EN 1092-1 | |---|---|---|---| | 压力等级 | PN 系列 | Class 150/300/600… | PN 6/10/16/25/40… | | 密封面 | RF/FM/M 等 | RF/RJ/FF | Type A/B/C/D… | | 尺寸/螺栓 | 按公称通径 | 英制螺栓孔距 | 公制/英制并存 | | 材料 | 国标牌号 | ASTM A182 等锻件 | EN 10222-5 等 |
采购建议:
1) 同一项目不要混用三套体系的法兰,除非确认压力等级、密封面与螺栓孔可互换; 2) 对照表只标注"压力等级近似",实际尺寸以标准尺寸表为准; 3) 密封面型式(RF/FF/RJ)与垫片要匹配,否则易泄漏; 4) 出口项目注明标准版本与材料牌号体系(如 ASME B16.5 + ASTM A182 F316L)。
法兰是承压件,标准与材料写清楚,比只看"不锈钢"三个字重要得多。
Compiled by SteelWe editors and industry experts. For industry exchange only; not trading or investment advice. Cite the source when quoting.
Related
Standards ⇄
Q&A ❓
Defect atlas ⚙
Industry glossary 📖
Need a case-specific assessment?
Ask with grade, medium, temperature and process — experts give reasoning.
Ask now →
Ask AI (cites this knowledge base only)
Answers cite knowledge-base entries; uncovered questions become topic gaps.
Key takeaways?When does it not apply?Procurement pitfalls?