Verified global steel networkEncrypted · node-isolated
Help center
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
Market IntelSourcingKnowledgeQ&ACommunity
The steel home
New Q&A today—Verified experts—Knowledge items—City gatherings—open
SteelWe logoSteelWesteelwe.com
A verified collaboration network and digital living room for the global steel chain.
Steel is We.
Places
Intel
Matching
Knowledge
Hall of fame
Gatherings
Industry polls
Help & support
MTC verification
Standards
Company verification
On-chain evidence
AI assistant
Defects
Pricing
API 开放平台
About
About us
Guidelines
Privacy
Terms
Contact
RSS · 知识
Global steel intelligence
Weekly global steel market updates, CBAM compliance and process insights.
Weekly digest
© 2026 SteelWe Community.
Founded and operated by steel companies.
GB/T · ASTM · EN · JIS · ISO
[Regional nodes & data compliance] China data stays on the mainland node; the EU node follows GDPR and CBAM data requirements.
HomeForumQ&AKBMe
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Knowledge
  4. /
  5. Entry
ARTICLE
👁 1
⏱ ~1 min read
采购 · 技术协议 · 模板 · 验收

不锈钢板卷采购技术协议模板(可直接套用)

把牌号标准、表面、尺寸公差、交货状态、质保书、包装、验收与异议处理写进技术协议,能显著减少验收争议。
以下条款可直接用于不锈钢板/卷采购技术协议(按项目删改):
1) 产品与标准:牌号____,执行标准____(如 ASTM A240 / EN 10088-2 / GB/T 3280),尺寸标准____(如 A480 / EN 10131 / GB/T 708)。 2) 化学成分与力学性能:符合上述标准;附加要求(如 Ni≥8.0%、PREN≥____)另列。 3) 表面:代号____(2B/BA/No.4),允许缺陷与封样要求:____。 4) 尺寸与公差:厚度____mm(公差等级____),宽度____mm,长度/卷重____,内径____mm,板形要求(波浪/瓢曲)____。 5) 交货状态:固溶/退火/冷作硬化状态,边缘状态(切边/毛边),是否平整。 6) 质保书:EN 10204 3.1(或 3.2)证书,含炉批号、实测成分与力学性能;可追溯炉号。 7) 包装与标识:保护膜(如需)、防潮、吊装标识、卷号与标签位置。 8) 检验与验收:到货抽检比例、PMI 光谱复验、尺寸与表面检验方法、允许复验规则。 9) 异议处理:质量异议提出期限____天,复检机构约定,退换货与索赔方式。 10) 交付与单证:交货期、装运条件(FOB/CIF 等)、随货单证清单。
建议:把关键指标(牌号、表面、公差、质保书类型)加粗列为"关键条款",验收时逐条核对,避免口头约定。
Compiled by SteelWe editors and industry experts. For industry exchange only; not trading or investment advice. Cite the source when quoting.
Related
Standards ⇄
Q&A ❓
Defect atlas ⚙
Industry glossary 📖
Need a case-specific assessment?
Ask with grade, medium, temperature and process — experts give reasoning.
Ask now →
Ask AI (cites this knowledge base only)
Answers cite knowledge-base entries; uncovered questions become topic gaps.
Key takeaways?When does it not apply?Procurement pitfalls?